Losch Management Company

Client Letter April 2001

Home Page

Back Home Up Next

 

Philosophy                         

  Lunch Money  Indicators
  Physics Envy   
   Moats    
   Behavioral Finance     
   Easy Money   
 

Company History         

  Performance History   
  Personal History   
  Money Management   
 

Comment

   Client Letters 2000
   Client Letters 2001
   Client Letters 2002    
   Client Letters 2003  
   Client Letters 2004   
   Client Letters 2005   
   Client Letters 2006
   Client Letters 2007
   Client Letters 2008

Berkshire Hathaway

   Stock Holdings   
   20 Year Tables   
   Furniture Business   
   Look-Through Earnings 
   Valuation   
   Insurance Float   
 

Estate Planning

Family Limited Partnerships   
Living Trusts   
Other Trusts   


Hotels with Propellers

 

The cruise business is in a very competitive business, with many big-time competitors for the consumer's vacation dollars: Disney, Las Vegas, resort hotels, time-shares, and other vacation options. But, the vacation business is a huge industry and cruises are presently a very small portion of the overall market. It is estimated that cruise ships will carry 6.6 million passengers next year. The business has been growing at about 9% per year since 1970 when Carnival sailed its first ship to the Caribbean and the entire industry boarded a total of 500,000 passengers.

Between them, Carnival and Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD (RCL) have revenues of $6.8 billion and are about 69% of the cruise business.

Moats

Warren Buffett likes the companies he buys to have moats (protective devices to ward off competitors) and he wants those moats well protected with alligators and poisonous snakes. The cruise industry in general, and Carnival in particular have some interesting alligators:
  1. Because the cruise companies are foreign corporations, and because most of the business of cruising is done offshore, substantially all of Carnival's income is exempt from U.S. corporate tax. This means that cruise companies have lower costs, and more cash flow to spend on expansion than their competitors in other segments of the vacation business
  2. Since most of the companies shipboard employees are foreign nationals and are not US residents, they are not subject to US income taxes on wages, and their employers are not required to contribute Social Security and Medicare taxes on their behalf. These tax advantages are a considerable competitive advantage for the cruise industry because their main competition for the vacation dollar are the theme parks in Orlando and the casinos in Las Vegas. Both of which are very labor intensive and pay lots of taxes.
  3. Employee wage costs in general are be much lower than onshore competitors'. The employees live on board their ships and do not have a housing expense. For many of the workers, their main source income is tips. There is free medical care on board the ships so heath insurance cost will be lower. There is no workers' compensation expense, and no access to American courts as means to pursue employee grievances.
  4. The ships have propellers. While most of the recreation industries are intensely seasonal (Las Vegas is hot in the summer and cold in the winter, Orlando has very hot, very long summers). The cruise business can mitigate this seasonality to some extent by moving its best ships to take advantage of seasonal rate premiums. Their ships can sail Alaska in the summer and the Baja or Caribbean in the winter. They can sail Scandinavia in the summer and the Mediterranean in the spring and fall. To deal with this alligator the competition would have to put Las Vegas on wheels and take it to Seattle in the summertime, or build a dome over Central Florida and run the air conditioner at 78 degrees for seven months.

Price Advantages

For those who have not been on a cruise recently, the prices have been coming down steadily for the last five years. The quality of the food and entertainment has been improving as the industry matures. There are lots of deals offered and the price of the cruise includes just about everything. In today's market you can get decent accommodations for somewhere around $100 to $150 per person per night. This does not include best class cabin on the newest ships, but all meals are included, as is pretty much continuous free entertainment. From my point view this is a pretty competitive package when compared to a visit to a theme park, unless you prefer standing in line to eating, drinking, and sitting in a hot tub. At my stage of life this is definitely a no brainer.
In the cruise business today Carnival is basically the 800-pound gorilla. Carnival has 44 ships in operation and 16 more on order for delivery over the next five years. It enjoys a market share of something over 40% of the total North American cruise business. The company was built with acquisitions and include in addition to the Carnival brand, The Holland America Line, Seabourn Cruise Line, Windstar Cruises, Costa Cruises, and the Cunard Line.

Competition

Number two Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., which also owns Celebrity Cruises, has 17 ships in operation and 10 more on order. Current market share for RCL is about 29%. Its newest ships are pretty spectacular and include ice skating rinks and Internet lounges. RCL would appear attractively priced at 10 times earnings compared CCL's 17, but while Carnival has been able to build its fleet from mostly cash flow, RCL has had to borrow extensively to keep up.
The whole industry is engaged an aggressive ship building campaign and fears that additional capacity will erode profit margins (together with worries about higher fuel costs) has brought the price of both of these stocks well down from their historic highs. I think it quite likely that prices will continue to weaken as this new capacity is brought on line. But the lower prices will continue to improve the competitive advantage that cruising currently enjoys compared to land-based vacation alternatives. It is my feeling that the competition will eventually work to the advantage of the biggest and strongest competitor so I tend to like Carnival better. But RCL may also be attractive if the current recession does not damage their bottom line severely.
In view of the market's concern about the rate of new shipbuilding, I decided to do a spreadsheet on Carnival's ship building program. The following statistics may shed some light on how aggressive it is.

North American Passenger Traffic

From 1970 to today the North American passenger traffic has grown at an average annual rate of 9.0%. The CCL annual report gives the following figures for recent history.
Since 1993, total North American passengers have grown from 4.4 million to 6.6 million estimated for this year. That is an average 6.6% per year. During the same period Carnival traffic has grown at 12.7% per year and their market share has grown from 25.7% in 1993 to 40.1% in 2000.
Carnival will expand its capacity from 48,196 berths in 2000 to 71,984 in 2004 through the addition of new ships to its fleet. This does not seem terribly out of line with its historical grown, and does not take into account the likely sale of some of its older ships.
In 2000 Carnival acquired the 50% of Costa that it did not already own, and announced plans for aggressive expansion of Costa's fleet. Costa is the largest cruise line in Europe. The European cruise market is much smaller than the North American market but has been growing at a 15% annual rate in recent years.
Finally there many eventually be a fifth alligator for Carnival. Since they are a foreign corp. and operate offshore this may put them beyond the reach of US antitrust law and eventually allow them to build a truly obscene market share.

 

© 2006 Losch Management Company - All rights reserved. |  Terms of Use
 
For information comment or questions :

           Return to Home page   

                      
     Last modified: March 16, 2008