|
Losch Management Company Client Letter January 2006
|
|
2005
2005 was a pretty dull year for our accounts and the market as a whole. With
the composite of our accounts up 2.18% for the year, we fell in between the
Dow which was down 0.61% in 2005 and the S&P which was up 3.0%. The good
news is that we were able to accomplish this while we maintained a very low
level of risk. This was possible with our long positions in Berkshire
Hathaway hedged with the two Rydex short funds and a high level of cash. As
long as we can stay close to market performance in a flat market, we can
continue to maintain a lot of down side protection.
The current bull market is now over three years old, and is getting very
long of tooth. The last secular bear market (1966-1982) contained no bull
market that lasted more than two years. That does not mean that we cannot
have another year like the last, but, for now, we will continue our
defensive posture. Most of the strategies that outperformed in 2005 did so
by accepting a lot of risk. Chasing performance in a high risk market is
just not our thing.
Some of the bulls claim that the secular bear market is over, but we remain
unconvinced. We prefer to wait a while and see how the slow down in real
estate plays out, or perhaps more important, to see if inflation starts to
reemerge.
Bill Gates Buys More Berkshire
A list of Gates' purchases
since September 20
That comes to 750 "A" Shares so far, or about $66 million at the current
market. I doubt that you will find many other insider purchases this large
in that period.
The patterns are interesting. Even though the amounts seem small, they
represent a significant portion of the volume for the day. For instance, on
Dec 23 when he bought 30 shares and the total volume for the day was 100
shares. It appears that he is buying about as much as he can at any one time
without running the stock.
He has purchased no "B" shares, even though these are more liquid and he
could purchase larger dollar amounts without moving the market. This would
indicate that voting rights are important to him. It is not clear to me why
this would be so, and may indicate that his goal is to own more than the
4,030 shares he now holds. Why would voting rights be important if you only
hold 0.31% of the 1,268,783 voting shares?
The purchases in September were at lower prices ($82,500 to $83,700) so
price may not be his only consideration.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last modified: March 16, 2008 |